Back to Dashboard
51

GTLB

💻 Technology

GitLab Inc.

Conservative #535Aggressive #186Moderate RiskModerate 63ML↑ 18pt
$25.97+4.17%
Day High$26.04
Day Low$24.36
Volume4.6M
Mkt Cap$4.4B
52W Low $2452W High $64
Market Cap
$5.0B
P/E Ratio
28.8
Sector avg: 87.8
Rev Growth
30.9%
Sector avg: 14.8%
Earnings Growth
98.5%
Profit Margin
-0.8%
Sector avg: -110.0%
Debt/Equity
0.00

Why This Score

GTLB scores 51.0 on the Conservative profile, blending a fundamental score (80% weight, emphasizing quality and stability (84% of fundamental weight)) with a machine-learning signal (20% weight) trained on 82 features across 30 years of data.

Strengths
  • Minimal leverage (D/E 0.00) provides financial flexibility and downside protection.
Risk Factors
  • Signal divergence: Fundamental and ML signals disagree by a significant margin, reducing confidence.

Minor adjustments (-2.5 points) applied. GTLB's rank of #535 primarily reflects its factor profile relative to the conservative weight vector.

Score Breakdown

Overall Score51.0
Fundamental Score43.6
ML Score75.0

Score by Horizon

3 Month
55.9
6 Month
62.5
Primary
1 Year
65.8

Quality Assessment

C
Earnings Grade
Mixed fundamentals, potential quality issues

Position Sizing

Suggested Allocation
5%
Confidence
high

Score Composition Waterfall

How each component affects the final score
Backtested Scoring Levers (IC-calibrated from 30y ElasticNet)
Weinstein (12.1%)
0
Declining
Sentiment (2.5%)
56
Neutral
Analyst (6.4%)
65
Favorable
Tradability (post-hoc)
95
Grade A
Base
49.9
SHAP
+2.4
Factors
+1.2
Divergence
-2.5
Final
51.0
Positive adjustment
Negative adjustment
Base blend
Final score

Factor Breakdown

66AVG
Value55
Quality40
Growth90
Stability90
Investment55

Signal SegmentsComputed from ML features

Fundamental (Valuation, Quality, Growth)57.0
Technical (Momentum, Weinstein, Volatility)33.0
External (Sentiment, Analyst, Macro)80.0
Scores below 50 indicate weakness in that segment relative to the universe.

Data Quality

Score
Features
Confidence
Feature Coverage96%

Growth Estimates

Short-term
-1.1% to +3.1%
Medium-term
-1.2% to +5.2%
Long-term
-1.2% to +7.4%

ML Model Core Features100 trained inputs → ML Score: 75

These features are direct inputs to the machine learning model. The model was trained on these signals alongside 100 features (including 12 momentum/technical indicators) to produce the ML percentile score.

Analyst Intelligence
Consensus Score64.7/100
Target Upside+77.1%
Coverage29 analysts
Market Sentiment
Sentiment Score55.9/100
News Volume1 articles
Technical Stage
Weinstein Stage4 — Declining
12M Momentum-0.5%
6M Momentum-0.4%
Volatility+0.1%
Momentum & Technical
Momentum Acceleration-12.5%
Momentum ConsistencyStrong (0.76)
Relative Strength vs Sector-54.5%
Trend Strength (ADX Proxy)Strong (5.0)
Momentum Quality-0.309
Momentum BreadthNarrow
Macro Regime
Bull RegimeYes
High Vol RegimeNo
S&P 500 Return+25.0%
Yield Curve-0.1bp

Sector-Relative AnalysisIn-model features

Value Trap Signal
1%
Low risk
Sector RevGr Rank
P89
Revenue growth vs Technology peers
Sector PE Rank
P42
Valuation vs Technology peers
Sector FCF Rank
P17
Free cash flow vs Technology peers
Growth Deviation
+0.4σ
Z-score vs sector median
Stagnation Flag
NO
Not flagged

Analysis Signals

Scoring Factors
Fundamental score of 47 relative to sector peers47/100
Machine learning model ranks this stock at the 66th percentileP66
ML model weight reduced to 9% due to macro conditions: market in extended rally phase; yield curve inverted (recession indicator); late-cycle economic indicators detected9% ML weight
SHAP feature alignment: +2.4pt (features align with model priorities)—
Blend: 91% fund (47.3) + 9% ML (65.6) + SHAP(+2.4) = 51.3—
Factor quality: +1.2pt (multi-factor composite)—
Risk assessment: moderate. Annualized volatility 9.0%. Max drawdown 39% (-12.0 pts). Price momentum -51% (-9.2 pts)Moderate
Market cap adjustment: +0.5 points ($5.0B market cap)+0.5 pts
Divergence penalty: -1.2pt (ML 18pt higher)—
Risk Factors
Earnings quality grade C: mixed earnings quality, some red flags. Score adjusted by -9 pointsGrade C
Quality concern: Elevated non-operating income: 18pp gap between net and operating marginFlag

Sector Peer Comparison(Technology — Rank #128 of 289 stocks)

StockScoreP/ERev GrowthMarginMkt Cap
GTLB51.028.830.9%-0.8%$5.0B
MPWR84.891.721.2%81.0%$57.1B
ZM84.218.03.1%21.7%$27.7B
NVDA80.645.2114.2%55.8%$4.5T
CRUS79.719.16.0%17.5%$7.4B
ASML77.848.115.6%29.4%$546.0B
IDCC77.431.8-4.0%48.8%$9.7B
CSCO77.127.65.3%18.0%$303.6B
RMBS75.548.320.7%32.3%$11.0B
DBX75.313.91.9%17.7%$6.4B
FSLR75.017.326.7%30.7%$24.2B
SIMO74.79.210.2%13.8%$4.5B
ADI74.374.116.9%20.6%$165.1B
AAPL72.533.16.4%27.0%$3.9T
OLED72.527.012.4%34.3%$5.9B
AMAT72.336.44.4%24.7%$281.7B
Sector Average47.487.814.8%-110.0%—

Market Sentimentvia FMP

Analyst Consensus
Buy29 analysts
Buy: 18Hold: 10Sell: 1
Price Target
$43consensus
Low $34Median $40High $55
+65.0% to consensus target

Company Overviewvia FMP

GitLab Inc., through its subsidiaries, develops software for the software development lifecycle in the United States, Europe, and the Asia Pacific. The company offers GitLab, a DevOps platform, which is a single application that leads to faster cycle time and allows visibility throughout and control over various stages of the DevOps lifecycle. It helps organizations to plan, build, secure, and deploy software to drive business outcomes. The company also provides related training and professional services. The company was formerly known as GitLab B.V. and changed its name to GitLab Inc. in July 2015. The company was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

CEO
William Staples
Employees
2,375
Beta
0.75
Industry
Software - Application
FMP-Identified Peers

Technical Picturecomputed from daily prices

RSI (14)
28.5
Oversold
Trend
Bearish
10-day vs 50-day MA
From 52W High
-59.7%
High: $64.42
From 52W Low
+10.7%
Low: $23.45
Moving Averages
10-Day
$27.70
Below
20-Day
$30.60
Below
50-Day
$34.30
Below
200-Day
$42.70
Below
60-Day Support
$23.45
60-Day Resistance
$43.65
Weinstein Stage Analysisbased on 200-day SMA framework
Stage 4 — DecliningScore: 0/100

Stock is in a downtrend below the 200-day moving average. Price is below both the 50-day and 200-day SMAs, indicating sustained selling pressure.

Unfavorable technical position; wait for Stage 1 basing
Price vs 200 SMA
-39.2%
200 SMA Slope (60d)
-10.36%
Falling
Volume Ratio
1.32x
10d avg vs 50d avg
Days in Stage
77
Confidence: 90%
Recent Gap Down

Financial Statementslast 4 quarters via FMP

MetricQ3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2025
Revenue$244M$236M$215M$211M
Gross Profit$212M$207M$189M$189M
Operating Income$-12M$-18M$-35M$-19M
Net Income$-8M$-9M$-36M$6M
EPS (Diluted)$-0.05$-0.06$-0.22$0.06
Gross Margin86.8%87.9%88.3%89.2%
Operating Margin-5.1%-7.8%-16.1%-9.1%
Net Margin-3.4%-3.9%-16.7%2.7%

Why This Stock

TechnologyRevenue growth 30.9%

Tradability FilterGrade A — 95/100Score impact: -8.3pt

Volume
100
5.0M avg/day
Dollar Vol
100
$120M/day
Float
100
145M shares
Mkt Cap
65
$5.0B
Range
100
171% spread
Composite Liquidity Score95/100
FDCBA

Multi-Year Range Analysis

Sideways: 0/100
YearLowHighRangeStatus
2022$30.74$88.1796.6%Wide
2023$26.24$67.5588.1%Wide
2024$40.72$78.5363.4%Wide
2025$35.81$74.1869.8%Wide
3-Year Range
99.8%
Narrow Years
0 / 4
Sideways Penalty
None

Growth Projection Adjustment

0.7x dampening
weinstein basing

Growth estimates have been dampened based on technical and fundamental signals. This is a post-hoc adjustment to prevent overly optimistic projections for stocks showing declining momentum or deteriorating fundamentals.

Free Float
86.1%
Outstanding Shares
168M
Bid-Ask Spread
171.0%
Institutional Tradable
Yes

Scores are generated by a multi-stage ML pipeline combining fundamental analysis, ensemble predictions, and structural risk signals. All data is for research purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.