Liquidia Corporation
LQDA scores 30.7 on the Conservative profile, blending a fundamental score (80% weight, emphasizing quality and stability (84% of fundamental weight)) with a machine-learning signal (20% weight) trained on 82 features across 30 years of data.
Net penalties of -12.5 points significantly impact the ranking. Without these adjustments, LQDA would rank considerably higher.
These features are direct inputs to the machine learning model. The model was trained on these signals alongside 100 features (including 12 momentum/technical indicators) to produce the ML percentile score.
| Stock | Score | P/E | Rev Growth | Margin | Mkt Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LQDA | 30.7 | N/A | -20.0% | -176.0% | $2.9B |
| INCY | 89.6 | 15.8 | 21.2% | 25.0% | $20.1B |
| GMAB | 85.5 | 13.1 | 22.8% | 36.4% | $18.5B |
| CPRX | 82.2 | 13.7 | 23.5% | 37.6% | $3.0B |
| VRTX | 78.0 | 32.1 | 8.9% | 32.9% | $126.0B |
| ASND | 75.7 | 16.6 | 98.0% | -31.7% | $13.3B |
| NBIX | 74.7 | 26.5 | 21.4% | 16.7% | $12.5B |
| ALKS | 74.6 | 16.5 | -6.4% | 23.9% | $5.5B |
| AMGN | 73.8 | 26.0 | 10.0% | 21.0% | $199.0B |
| ARGX | 73.6 | 35.1 | 78.6% | 38.0% | $50.9B |
| HOLX | 73.3 | 31.1 | 1.7% | 13.8% | $16.8B |
| REGN | 72.7 | 19.4 | 1.0% | 31.4% | $84.9B |
| ISRG | 72.3 | 61.7 | 20.5% | 28.4% | $172.5B |
| EXEL | 71.9 | 15.1 | 7.0% | 33.7% | $11.7B |
| KRYS | 71.0 | 41.4 | 473.0% | 30.7% | $8.0B |
| HALO | 70.2 | 16.8 | 22.4% | 43.7% | $9.3B |
| Sector Average | 37.1 | 252.3 | 161.5% | -3292.7% | — |
Liquidia Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company, develops, manufactures, and commercializes various products for unmet patient needs in the United States. Its product candidates include YUTREPIA, an inhaled dry powder formulation of treprostinil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. It also distributes generic treprostinil injection in the United States. Liquidia Corporation was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Morrisville, North Carolina.
Stock is in an uptrend above the 200-day moving average. This is the stage where institutional accumulation typically occurs. The 50-day SMA provides support.
| Metric | Q3 2025 | Q2 2025 | Q1 2025 | Q4 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $54M | $9M | $3M | $3M |
| Gross Profit | $51M | $8M | $2M | $2M |
| Operating Income | $2M | $-38M | $-35M | $-36M |
| Net Income | $-4M | $-42M | $-38M | $-38M |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.04 | $-0.49 | $-0.45 | $-0.45 |
| Gross Margin | 94.2% | 85.4% | 51.4% | 53.6% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | -424.4% | -1135.4% | -1237.8% |
| Net Margin | -6.5% | -470.5% | -1229.7% | -1315.4% |
| Year | Low | High | Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $2.25 | $5.40 | 82.4% | Wide |
| 2022 | $3.26 | $8.79 | 91.8% | Wide |
| 2023 | $5.67 | $12.36 | 74.2% | Wide |
| 2024 | $8.26 | $16.99 | 69.1% | Wide |
| 2025 | $11.26 | $36.41 | 105.5% | Wide |
Growth estimates have been dampened based on technical and fundamental signals. This is a post-hoc adjustment to prevent overly optimistic projections for stocks showing declining momentum or deteriorating fundamentals.
Scores are generated by a multi-stage ML pipeline combining fundamental analysis, ensemble predictions, and structural risk signals. All data is for research purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.