Back to Dashboard
8

QUBT

💻 Technology

Quantum Computing, Inc.

Conservative #1405Aggressive #1372High RiskLow 2F↑ 42pt
$8.68+7.03%
Day High$8.94
Day Low$8.09
Volume14.6M
Mkt Cap$1.2B
52W Low $452W High $26
Market Cap
$1.1B
P/E Ratio
N/A
Rev Growth
4.2%
Sector avg: 14.8%
Earnings Growth
-153.7%
Profit Margin
-12519.2%
Sector avg: -110.0%
Debt/Equity
0.00

Why This Score

QUBT scores 7.9 on the Conservative profile, blending a fundamental score (80% weight, emphasizing quality and stability (84% of fundamental weight)) with a machine-learning signal (20% weight) trained on 82 features across 30 years of data.

Strengths
  • Minimal leverage (D/E 0.00) provides financial flexibility and downside protection.
  • Positive but moderate momentum (40%) — steady appreciation without overheating.
Risk Factors
  • Above-average volatility (31.9%) may not suit conservative risk tolerance.

Net penalties of -19.8 points significantly impact the ranking. Without these adjustments, QUBT would rank considerably higher.

Score Breakdown

Overall Score7.9
Fundamental Score24.6
ML Score6.0

Score by Horizon

3 Month
1.0
6 Month
1.1
Primary
1 Year
1.2

Quality Assessment

D
Earnings Grade
Weak fundamentals or significant quality concerns
Speculative Classification
Speculative growth — negative margins and ROE with momentum-driven price action. High risk of mean reversion.
Anomalous margin data — extreme values suggest one-time events or accounting irregularities.
Conservative score reduced by 7 points.

Position Sizing

Suggested Allocation
2.5%
Confidence
high

Score Composition Waterfall

How each component affects the final score
Backtested Scoring Levers (IC-calibrated from 30y ElasticNet)
Weinstein (12.1%)
0
Declining
Sentiment (2.5%)
83
Positive
Analyst (6.4%)
67
Favorable
Tradability (post-hoc)
91
Grade A
Base
13.8
SHAP
+0.7
Factors
-1.5
Conviction
-4.6
Divergence
-0.5
Final
7.9
Positive adjustment
Negative adjustment
Base blend
Final score

Signal SegmentsComputed from ML features

Fundamental (Valuation, Quality, Growth)43.0
Technical (Momentum, Weinstein, Volatility)30.0
External (Sentiment, Analyst, Macro)87.0
Scores below 50 indicate weakness in that segment relative to the universe.

Data Quality

Score
Features
Confidence
Feature Coverage89%

Growth Estimates

Short-term
-41.6% to -29.6%
Medium-term
-57.7% to -41.7%
Long-term
-74.1% to -50.1%

ML Model Core Features100 trained inputs → ML Score: 6

These features are direct inputs to the machine learning model. The model was trained on these signals alongside 100 features (including 12 momentum/technical indicators) to produce the ML percentile score.

Analyst Intelligence
Consensus Score66.7/100
Target Upside+191.0%
Coverage3 analysts
Market Sentiment
Sentiment Score82.8/100
News Volume1 articles
Technical Stage
Weinstein Stage4 — Declining
12M Momentum+0.4%
6M Momentum-0.5%
Volatility+0.3%
Momentum & Technical
Momentum Acceleration+86.0%
Momentum ConsistencyDivergent (-0.86)
Relative Strength vs Sector+36.1%
Trend Strength (ADX Proxy)Weak (1.2)
Momentum Quality+0.175
Momentum BreadthNarrow
Macro Regime
Bull RegimeYes
High Vol RegimeNo
S&P 500 Return+25.0%
Yield Curve-0.1bp

Sector-Relative AnalysisIn-model features

Value Trap Signal
3%
Low risk
Sector RevGr Rank
P29
Revenue growth vs Technology peers
Sector PE Rank
P78
Valuation vs Technology peers
Sector FCF Rank
P6
Free cash flow vs Technology peers
Growth Deviation
-0.1σ
Z-score vs sector median
Stagnation Flag
NO
Not flagged

Analysis Signals

Scoring Factors
Fundamental score of 48 relative to sector peers48/100
Machine learning model ranks this stock at the 6th percentileP6
ML model weight reduced to 9% due to macro conditions: market in extended rally phase; yield curve inverted (recession indicator); late-cycle economic indicators detected9% ML weight
SHAP feature alignment: +0.7pt (features align with model priorities)—
Blend: 91% fund (47.8) + 9% ML (5.9) + SHAP(+0.7) = 44.7—
Factor quality: -1.5pt (multi-factor composite)—
Market cap adjustment: -8.0 points ($1.1B market cap)-8.0 pts
Conviction penalty: -4.6pt (conviction=2)—
Divergence penalty: -4.8pt (fund 42pt higher)—
Risk Factors
Risk assessment: high. Annualized volatility 31.9%. Max drawdown 56% (-12.0 pts)High
Earnings quality grade D: weak earnings quality, multiple concerns. Score adjusted by -18 pointsGrade D
Quality concern: Non-operating loss: operating margin (-6918.5%) exceeds net margin (-12519.2%) by 5601pp — possible write-down; High accrual ratio (66.3%) — earnings quality concernFlag

Sector Peer Comparison(Technology — Rank #288 of 289 stocks)

StockScoreP/ERev GrowthMarginMkt Cap
QUBT7.9N/A4.2%-12519.2%$1.1B
MPWR84.891.721.2%81.0%$57.1B
ZM84.218.03.1%21.7%$27.7B
NVDA80.645.2114.2%55.8%$4.5T
CRUS79.719.16.0%17.5%$7.4B
ASML77.848.115.6%29.4%$546.0B
IDCC77.431.8-4.0%48.8%$9.7B
CSCO77.127.65.3%18.0%$303.6B
RMBS75.548.320.7%32.3%$11.0B
DBX75.313.91.9%17.7%$6.4B
FSLR75.017.326.7%30.7%$24.2B
SIMO74.79.210.2%13.8%$4.5B
ADI74.374.116.9%20.6%$165.1B
AAPL72.533.16.4%27.0%$3.9T
OLED72.527.012.4%34.3%$5.9B
AMAT72.336.44.4%24.7%$281.7B
Sector Average47.487.814.8%-110.0%—

Market Sentimentvia FMP

Analyst Consensus
Buy3 analysts
Buy: 2Hold: 1
Price Target
$23consensus
Low $12Median $16High $40
+161.2% to consensus target

Company Overviewvia FMP

Quantum Computing, Inc. focuses on providing software tools and applications for quantum computers in Virginia. The company offers Qatalyst, a quantum application accelerator that enables developers to create and execute quantum-ready applications on conventional computers, while being ready to run on quantum computers as well as provides multiple quantum processing units including DWave, Rigetti, and IonQ. It focuses on serving commercial and government entities. The company, formerly known as Innovative Beverage Group Holdings, Inc. Quantum Computing, Inc. was founded in 2018 and is based in Leesburg, Virginia.

CEO
Yuping Huang
Employees
41
Beta
3.48
Industry
Computer Hardware
FMP-Identified Peers

Technical Picturecomputed from daily prices

RSI (14)
46.4
Neutral
Trend
Bearish
10-day vs 50-day MA
From 52W High
-66.4%
High: $25.84
From 52W Low
+98.6%
Low: $4.37
Moving Averages
10-Day
$8.20
Above
20-Day
$8.80
Below
50-Day
$10.40
Below
200-Day
$14.40
Below
60-Day Support
$7.63
60-Day Resistance
$13.64
Weinstein Stage Analysisbased on 200-day SMA framework
Stage 4 — DecliningScore: 23/100

Stock is in a downtrend below the 200-day moving average. Price is below both the 50-day and 200-day SMAs, indicating sustained selling pressure.

Unfavorable technical position; wait for Stage 1 basing
Price vs 200 SMA
-39.7%
200 SMA Slope (60d)
+8.51%
Rising
Volume Ratio
0.67x
10d avg vs 50d avg
Days in Stage
55
Confidence: 40%

Financial Statementslast 4 quarters via FMP

MetricQ3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024
Revenue$384,000$61,000$39,000$62,000
Gross Profit$126,000$26,000$-962,000$-1M
Operating Income$-10M$-10M$-8M$-9M
Net Income$2M$-36M$17M$-51M
EPS (Diluted)$0.01$-0.26$0.11$-0.55
Gross Margin32.8%42.6%-2466.7%-1971.0%
Operating Margin-2709.4%-16673.8%-21246.2%-14377.4%
Net Margin620.3%-59806.6%43543.6%-82640.3%

Why This Stock

Technology

Tradability FilterGrade A — 91/100Score impact: -12.9pt

Volume
100
18.4M avg/day
Dollar Vol
100
$145M/day
Float
100
122M shares
Mkt Cap
42
$1.1B
Range
100
491% spread
Composite Liquidity Score91/100
FDCBA

Multi-Year Range Analysis

Sideways: 0/100
YearLowHighRangeStatus
2021$3.24$10.50105.7%Wide
2022$1.42$4.40102.4%Wide
2023$0.63$3.49138.5%Wide
2024$0.35$27.15194.8%Wide
2025$4.37$25.84142.1%Wide
3-Year Range
194.8%
Narrow Years
0 / 5
Sideways Penalty
None

Growth Projection Adjustment

0.15x dampening
weinstein declining

Growth estimates have been dampened based on technical and fundamental signals. This is a post-hoc adjustment to prevent overly optimistic projections for stocks showing declining momentum or deteriorating fundamentals.

Free Float
89.0%
Outstanding Shares
137M
Bid-Ask Spread
491.0%
Institutional Tradable
Yes

Scores are generated by a multi-stage ML pipeline combining fundamental analysis, ensemble predictions, and structural risk signals. All data is for research purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.