Back to Dashboard
36

GIG

๐Ÿฆ Financial Services

GigCapital7 Corp.

Conservative #964Aggressive #1333Low RiskFโ†‘ 19pt
$10.60-0.00%
Day High$10.61
Day Low$10.60
Volume0.1M
Mkt Cap$358M
52W Low $1052W High $13
Market Cap
$358M
P/E Ratio
N/A
Rev Growth
0.0%
Sector avg: 13.4%
Earnings Growth
0.0%
Profit Margin
4.0%
Sector avg: -2.8%
Debt/Equity
0.01

Why This Score

GIG scores 35.8 on the Conservative profile, blending a fundamental score (80% weight, emphasizing quality and stability (84% of fundamental weight)) with a machine-learning signal (20% weight) trained on 82 features across 30 years of data.

Strengths
  • Low volatility (1.2% annualized) โ€” well-suited for risk-averse portfolios.
  • Minimal leverage (D/E 0.01) provides financial flexibility and downside protection.
Risk Factors
  • Liquidity concern: Limited trading volume or float results in a 15-point penalty for execution risk.
  • Signal divergence: Fundamental and ML signals disagree by a significant margin, reducing confidence.

Net penalties of -23.8 points significantly impact the ranking. Without these adjustments, GIG would rank considerably higher.

Score Breakdown

Overall Score35.8
Fundamental Score61.1
ML Score27.0

Score by Horizon

3 Month
1.9
6 Month
2.1
Primary
1 Year
2.2

Quality Assessment

F
Quality Grade
Low quality โ€” significant fundamental weaknesses
1 quality flag detected โ€” see details below. These penalties are already factored into the final score.
Quality Flags
False stability: 0.012 vol with only 0.0% revenue growth โ€” stagnation, not safety

Position Sizing

Suggested Allocation
5%
Confidence
medium

Score Composition Waterfall

How each component affects the final score
Backtested Scoring Levers (IC-calibrated from 30y ElasticNet)
Weinstein (12.1%)
100
Advancing
Sentiment (2.5%)
41
Neutral
Analyst (6.4%)
50
Neutral
Tradability (post-hoc)
23
Grade Dlow volume, low dollar volume
Base
39.2
SHAP
+2.4
Factors
-0.3
Conviction
-2.7
Divergence
-2.9
Final
35.8
Positive adjustment
Negative adjustment
Base blend
Final score

Factor Breakdown

45AVG
Value50
Quality15
Growth40
Stability93
Investment26

Signal SegmentsComputed from ML features

Fundamental (Valuation, Quality, Growth)34.0
Technical (Momentum, Weinstein, Volatility)80.0
External (Sentiment, Analyst, Macro)60.0
Scores below 50 indicate weakness in that segment relative to the universe.

Data Quality

Score
Features
Confidence
Feature Coverage89%

Growth Estimates

Short-term
-10.7% to -3.6%
Medium-term
-14.2% to -4.2%
Long-term
-17.7% to -4.8%

ML Model Core Features100 trained inputs โ†’ ML Score: 27

These features are direct inputs to the machine learning model. The model was trained on these signals alongside 100 features (including 12 momentum/technical indicators) to produce the ML percentile score.

Analyst Intelligence
Consensus Score50.0/100
Target Upside+0.0%
Coverage0 analysts
Market Sentiment
Sentiment Score40.6/100
News Volume0 articles
Technical Stage
Weinstein Stage2 โ€” Advancing
12M Momentum+0.1%
6M Momentum+0.0%
Volatility+0.0%
Momentum & Technical
Momentum Acceleration+2.9%
Momentum ConsistencyModerate (0.42)
Relative Strength vs Sector-3.8%
Trend Strength (ADX Proxy)Strong (4.2)
Momentum Quality+0.049
Momentum BreadthBroad โœ“
Macro Regime
Bull RegimeYes
High Vol RegimeNo
S&P 500 Return+25.0%
Yield Curve-0.1bp

Sector-Relative AnalysisIn-model features

Value Trap Signal
1%
Low risk
Sector RevGr Rank
P40
Revenue growth vs Financial Services peers
Sector PE Rank
P26
Valuation vs Financial Services peers
Sector FCF Rank
P9
Free cash flow vs Financial Services peers
Growth Deviation
-0.1ฯƒ
Z-score vs sector median
Stagnation Flag
NO
Not flagged

Analysis Signals

Scoring Factors
Fundamental score of 61 relative to sector peers61/100
Machine learning ensemble ranks this stock at the 27th percentileP27
Blended score: 80% fundamental (61) + 20% ML (27) = 54.354.3
Risk assessment: low. Low vol 0.0%; Drawdown 3% โ†’ 0.0ptLow
Earnings quality grade F: quality flags triggered โ€” see details below. Score adjusted by 0 pointsGrade F
SHAP feature alignment: +2.4pt (features align with model priorities)SHAP
Conviction adj: -2.7pt (conviction=N/A)Conviction
Divergence penalty: -2.9pt (ML 34pt lower)Divergence
Risk Factors
Quality concern: False stability: 0.012 vol with only 0.0% revenue growth โ€” stagnation, not safetyFlag
Liquidity penalty: -15.0pt (grade D)Liquidity

Sector Peer Comparison(Financial Services โ€” Rank #259 of 356 stocks)

StockScoreP/ERev GrowthMarginMkt Cap
GIG35.8N/A0.0%4.0%$358M
CME86.427.29.9%57.5%$114.0B
FHB84.911.83.2%24.2%$3.1B
ACT84.58.92.4%54.6%$6.1B
CINF84.210.711.4%18.9%$25.4B
SEIC82.214.010.7%27.3%$9.9B
TROW79.910.13.1%28.5%$20.5B
QQQX79.710.448.6%257.3%$1.4B
IBOC78.210.67.5%40.1%$4.2B
HWC77.812.2-1.5%24.1%$5.6B
FFIN77.518.811.7%30.7%$4.7B
TRMK77.111.934.8%19.3%$2.6B
NMIH77.17.78.4%55.1%$3.0B
EWBC76.712.74.6%28.3%$15.3B
WSFS76.312.8-3.1%21.1%$3.5B
MCHB76.1N/A123.7%23.2%$3.1B
Sector Average47.526.813.4%-2.8%โ€”

Company Overviewvia FMP

GigCapital7 Corp. operates as a blank check company. The Company was formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, amalgamation, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization, and similar business combination with one or more businesses.

CEO
Avishay S. Katz
Beta
6.48
Industry
Shell Companies
FMP-Identified Peers

Technical Picturecomputed from daily prices

RSI (14)
55.6
Neutral
Trend
Bearish
10-day vs 50-day MA
From 52W High
-15.2%
High: $12.5
From 52W Low
+5.2%
Low: $10.08
Moving Averages
10-Day
$10.60
Below
20-Day
$10.60
Below
50-Day
$10.60
Below
200-Day
$10.50
Above
60-Day Support
$10.47
60-Day Resistance
$10.73
Weinstein Stage Analysisbased on 200-day SMA framework
Stage 2 โ€” AdvancingScore: 57/100

Stock is in an uptrend above the 200-day moving average. This is the stage where institutional accumulation typically occurs. The 50-day SMA provides support.

Favorable technical position; 50-day SMA acts as support
Price vs 200 SMA
+1%
200 SMA Slope (60d)
+1.18%
Flattening
Volume Ratio
0.72x
10d avg vs 50d avg
Days in Stage
100
Confidence: 90%

Entry & Exit Zones

In Entry Zone
$9.98
Stop Entry Now Target
$13.45
Entry Zone
$10.49 โ€“ $10.92
SMA50 pullback zone ($10.49โ€“$10.92)
Exit Target
$13.06
52-week high / +22% target ($13.06)
Stop Level
$10.29
Below SMA200 ($10.29)
Risk / Reward:1 : 5.67Favorable

Stage 2 uptrend โ€” institutional accumulation phase. SMA50 pullbacks are the highest-probability entry points. Stop below SMA200 preserves capital if trend breaks.

Technical zones only โ€” derived from moving averages and price structure. Not financial advice. Past technical patterns do not guarantee future performance.

Financial Statementslast 4 quarters via FMP

MetricQ3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024
Revenue$0$0$0$120M
Gross Profit$0$0$0$36M
Operating Income$-1M$-384,593$-371,833$-28M
Net Income$-212,080$2M$2M$2M
EPS (Diluted)$-0.01$0.05$0.05$0.04
Gross MarginN/AN/AN/A30.0%
Operating MarginN/AN/AN/A-23.0%
Net MarginN/AN/AN/A1.5%

Why This Stock

Financial Services

Tradability FilterGrade D โ€” 23/100Score impact: +3.5pt

Low Tradability Warning

This stock has limited trading volume and/or float. Institutional investors may face difficulty entering or exiting positions without significant price impact. A post-hoc penalty has been applied to the composite score (this is not a backtested model factor โ€” it is a practical tradability overlay).

Volume
33
150K avg/day
Dollar Vol
7
$2M/day
Float
33
15M shares
Mkt Cap
16
$358M
Range
16
24% spread
Composite Liquidity Score23/100
FDCBA
low volumelow dollar volumelow floatsmall cap

Growth Projection Adjustment

0.7x dampening
stagnation flag

Growth estimates have been dampened based on technical and fundamental signals. This is a post-hoc adjustment to prevent overly optimistic projections for stocks showing declining momentum or deteriorating fundamentals.

Free Float
44.5%
Outstanding Shares
34M
Bid-Ask Spread
24.0%
Institutional Tradable
No

Scores are generated by a multi-stage ML pipeline combining fundamental analysis, ensemble predictions, and structural risk signals. All data is for research purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.