Back to Dashboard
53

CRESY

🏭 Industrials

Cresud Sociedad AnΓ³nima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria

Conservative #477Aggressive #273Moderate RiskHigh 99
Market Cap
$753M
P/E Ratio
4.7
Sector avg: 64.5
Rev Growth
28.5%
Sector avg: 19.0%
Earnings Growth
22.5%
Profit Margin
22.3%
Sector avg: -48.2%
Debt/Equity
1.86

Why This Score

CRESY scores 53.2 on the Conservative profile, blending a fundamental score (80% weight, emphasizing quality and stability (84% of fundamental weight)) with a machine-learning signal (20% weight) trained on 82 features across 30 years of data.

Strengths
  • Strong profitability: ROE of 23.4% exceeds the 15% quality threshold.
  • High net margin of 22.3%, indicating pricing power and operational efficiency.
  • Attractively valued at 4.7x earnings, below the market average.
  • Positive but moderate momentum (20%) β€” steady appreciation without overheating.
  • High conviction (99/100) β€” fundamental and ML signals agree on this stock.
Risk Factors
  • Liquidity concern: Limited trading volume or float results in a 5-point penalty for execution risk.
  • Above-average volatility (12.4%) may not suit conservative risk tolerance.
  • Elevated leverage (D/E 1.85) increases financial risk in a rising-rate environment.

Moderate penalties (-5.0 points) reflect identified risk factors. The overall score balances these against the stock's fundamental strengths.

Score Breakdown

Overall Score53.2
Fundamental Score53.1
ML Score59.0

Score by Horizon

3 Month
69.8
6 Month
78.0
Primary
1 Year
82.1

Quality Assessment

C
Earnings Grade
Mixed fundamentals, potential quality issues

Position Sizing

Suggested Allocation
5%
Confidence
high

Score Composition Waterfall

How each component affects the final score
Backtested Scoring Levers (IC-calibrated from 30y ElasticNet)
Weinstein (12.1%)
100
Advancing
Sentiment (2.5%)
60
Positive
Analyst (6.4%)
75
Favorable
Tradability (post-hoc)
51
Grade Clow dollar volume
Base
49.2
SHAP
+1.7
Factors
+0.4
Conviction
+1.9
Final
53.2
Positive adjustment
Negative adjustment
Base blend
Final score

Signal SegmentsComputed from ML features

Fundamental (Valuation, Quality, Growth)81.0
Technical (Momentum, Weinstein, Volatility)75.0
External (Sentiment, Analyst, Macro)84.0
Scores below 50 indicate weakness in that segment relative to the universe.

Data Quality

Score
Features
Confidence
Feature Coverage89%

Growth Estimates

Short-term
-0.3% to +4.0%
Medium-term
+0.4% to +7.0%
Long-term
+1.1% to +10.0%

ML Model Core Features100 trained inputs β†’ ML Score: 59

These features are direct inputs to the machine learning model. The model was trained on these signals alongside 100 features (including 12 momentum/technical indicators) to produce the ML percentile score.

Analyst Intelligence
Consensus Score75.0/100
Target Upside+10.8%
Coverage1 analysts
Market Sentiment
Sentiment Score60.3/100
News Volume1 articles
Technical Stage
Weinstein Stage2 β€” Advancing
12M Momentum+0.2%
6M Momentum+0.3%
Volatility+0.1%
Momentum & Technical
Momentum Acceleration-5.9%
Momentum ConsistencyStrong (0.77)
Relative Strength vs Sector+8.2%
Trend Strength (ADX Proxy)Moderate (1.6)
Momentum Quality+0.152
Momentum BreadthBroad βœ“
Macro Regime
Bull RegimeYes
High Vol RegimeNo
S&P 500 Return+25.0%
Yield Curve-0.1bp

Sector-Relative AnalysisIn-model features

Value Trap Signal
10%
Low risk
Sector RevGr Rank
P86
Revenue growth vs Industrials peers
Sector PE Rank
P71
Valuation vs Industrials peers
Sector FCF Rank
P96
Free cash flow vs Industrials peers
Growth Deviation
+0.3Οƒ
Z-score vs sector median
Stagnation Flag
NO
Not flagged

Analysis Signals

Scoring Factors
Fundamental score of 77 relative to sector peers77/100
Machine learning model ranks this stock at the 82th percentileP82
ML model weight reduced to 9% due to macro conditions: market in extended rally phase; yield curve inverted (recession indicator); late-cycle economic indicators detected9% ML weight
SHAP feature alignment: +3.0pt (features align with model priorities)β€”
Blend: 91% fund (76.7) + 9% ML (82.4) + SHAP(+3.0) = 80.2β€”
Factor quality: +0.7pt (multi-factor composite)β€”
Risk assessment: moderate. Annualized volatility 12.4%. Max drawdown 23% (-6.1 pts)Moderate
Market cap adjustment: -15.0 points ($0.8B market cap)-15.0 pts
Conviction bonus: +3.5pt (conviction=99)β€”
Risk Factors
Earnings quality grade C: mixed earnings quality, some red flags. Score adjusted by -12 pointsGrade C
Quality concern: Non-operating loss: operating margin (45.8%) exceeds net margin (22.3%) by 23pp β€” possible write-down; High leverage: D/E ratio of 1.9x β€” elevated balance sheet riskFlag

Sector Peer Comparison(Industrials β€” Rank #43 of 135 stocks)

StockScoreP/ERev GrowthMarginMkt Cap
CRESY53.24.728.5%22.3%$753M
FER83.712.27.4%35.3%$51.9B
NDSN76.335.13.8%17.4%$16.6B
OMAB76.120.14.3%32.7%$6.2B
ODFL75.839.8-0.9%20.4%$40.6B
FAST72.742.68.7%15.3%$53.3B
WWD70.947.87.3%12.4%$22.8B
CSX70.926.5-3.1%20.5%$76.0B
LECO70.931.5-4.4%11.6%$16.2B
CTAS70.441.97.7%17.5%$77.7B
PCAR70.428.2-4.2%12.4%$66.7B
RYAAY69.713.03.8%11.6%$34.3B
CPRT69.123.09.7%33.4%$36.3B
FELE68.535.5-2.1%8.9%$4.8B
AEIS67.881.221.4%8.3%$11.9B
IESC67.730.916.9%9.1%$10.3B
Sector Average45.264.519.0%-48.2%β€”

Market Sentimentvia FMP

No analyst sentiment data available for CRESY.

Why This Stock

IndustrialsP/E ratio of 4.7Revenue growth 28.5%Profit margin 22.3%Valuation below sector median (P/E 4.7)

Tradability FilterGrade C β€” 51/100Score impact: -21.0pt

Volume
56
264K avg/day
Dollar Vol
26
$3M/day
Float
63
33M shares
Mkt Cap
35
$753M
Range
97
74% spread
Composite Liquidity Score51/100
FDCBA
low dollar volume

Multi-Year Range Analysis

Sideways: 0/100
YearLowHighRangeStatus
2021$3.84$7.2561.5%Wide
2022$4.02$9.4280.4%Wide
2023$5.39$10.0160%Wide
2024$6.51$14.1173.7%Wide
2025$8.32$13.9750.7%Wide
3-Year Range
89.4%
Narrow Years
0 / 5
Sideways Penalty
None
Free Float
53.3%
Outstanding Shares
63M
Bid-Ask Spread
74.0%
Institutional Tradable
Limited

Scores are generated by a multi-stage ML pipeline combining fundamental analysis, ensemble predictions, and structural risk signals. All data is for research purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.